So, I am kind of dead curious about something now. How old were you when your parents started allowing you to see rated R movies (and under what circumstances), and if you are a parent how old were your kids (or will your kids be) when you allow them? And also, I'm kind of wondering if when you were born affects this, because there were actually a lot more on the No You May not list for my kid than there were on my parent's list for me, even though we had roughly the same rules about it, on account of I think there were more movies with the kinds of graphic violence and extreme situations when my kid was growing up than when I did.

Like, okay...I mentioned in comments of the navel gazing post...in my house growing up, once we hit about, I guess 10 or 11 if one or both of my parents were going to see a rated R movie we were pretty much allowed to go with if we wanted as long as it didn't appear there would be excessive violence/gore/adult situations on the extreme sort of end mostly, or we could go to whatever other movie that was PG playing at the same time or whatever. We weren't allowed to go *without* a parent, and there were some movies on the No You May Not list even with until about I...want to say around 14, when I was basically allowed to go see whatever I wanted with or without a parent.

Just, in general my parents had pretty lax rules about media consumption in that we were allowed to read whatever we wanted from always (if you could pull it off a shelf and read the words in it? then it was your decision). Open communication was always encouraged about whatever it is we were reading or watching, but the decision (except, like I said up there in the case of movies with high gore/violence content) was up to us? Which, I don't know if it was just the lack of taboo, or if I was a boring kid, but to be honest most of the time I opted for the more 'kid friendly' movie in the theater, and the only arguments I remember about the No You May Not list was my growing love of horror at the time, and not being allowed to see a lot of those movies in theater (and on VHS) until a few years later.

In terms of my own kid, I mostly followed the same sort of deal. Read anything you want. Light restriction of movies/tv in that nudity/swearing were not dealbreakers but extreme violence of any kind would be until teenage years, when I started leaving it up to him.

So how did your parents handle it? And how do you/would you (if applicable) handle/plan to handle it with your own kids?
some_stars: (Default)

From: [personal profile] some_stars


I don't remember any restrictions on anything. I didn't consume a lot of media intended for adults until about age 10 or so, because I mostly wasn't interested in it, but sometimes I'd watch movies my parents were watching (like Silence of the Lambs, which I barely remember except for the night-vision goggles scene, for some reason) and they let me. And I was allowed to get anything I wanted from Blockbuster, which by the time I was in middle school included a lot of R-rated stuff. I could definitely read anything I wanted; I went through a major Stephen King phase for a few years starting in fourth grade.

I'm sure my parents noticed all the violent stuff I was consuming, but it was never a thing, like they didn't try and talk to me about it, as far as I remember. Of course when I was reading or watching something with sex I didn't want them to know about it, but because of the awkwardness rather than because I thought I'd get in trouble. Basically I just didn't have any content restrictions growing up. They also never cared about swearing, which may be related. They were (and are) eccentric academics, and not like the other parents in many ways.

With my kids...IDK, I think I'd like to be a little stricter about watching really violent stuff, but mostly I can't imagine taking a different approach than my parents. Like, the idea of saying no to a book is completely foreign to me. I feel like when I got exposed to ideas that I was too young to understand, I just kind of glided over them for a few years until they made sense, and no harm was done. Well, as far as I can tell. *g*
cathexys: dark sphinx (default icon) (Default)

From: [personal profile] cathexys


I do have books I wouldn't want my kids to read. There's de sade on my shelves and Leatherfolks with essays like "Is the Rectum a Grave" and...yes, these are things my kids wouldn't be allowed to read. Then again, they weren't asking to read it :) We had a Clockwork Orange debate last year with the then 13 year old, and he got to read the book but not the film (well, I ffwded through it to show him some of the iconic set design and scenes and the use of music, but I wasn't ready yet to have him see the entire thing). Mostly, we just talk about things and try to watch problematic media together...
cathexys: dark sphinx (default icon) (Default)

From: [personal profile] cathexys


Yes. I realize how media savvy my kids are every time I'm surprised at what my students DON'T get...like the usual underlying isms are something they jokingly or mom, are you gonna ruin this again kinda way...but they get it. I think it's because we do talk about it a lot, sometimes disagreeing but always talking!!!
dorinda: Two hands, one dangling a silver Comedy mask and one dangling a gold Tragedy mask, under the words THE PLAYERS. (Sting_players)

From: [personal profile] dorinda


I saw The Shining when I was 11 (with my dad, and my 13-year-old brother and his friends, for my brother's birthday). That's the first R-rated movie I remember seeing. I've never asked my dad about his rationale, but my assumption is that he knew I was ready for it because I had already read and enjoyed the book (as had my brother). I loved the film and I was definitely ready for it, temperament-wise and otherwise-wise.

We were always allowed to read whatever we could get our hands on (as the fact of me having read The Shining before age 11 indicates). I can't actually remember what the rules might have been, if any, about seeing movies. I actually doubt there were any, much like with the books.

No kids or prospect of kids to make or not make rules for... so in my household it's annnnaaarrrrrchyyyyyyyy. \o/
heresluck: (book)

From: [personal profile] heresluck


My parents handled it by never watching movies. No, seriously. They never went to the movies themselves, they never took us to the movies, they never rented movies even after we got a VCR (which took a while), we had a TV but never watched movies on it (except for that one month when we somehow had HBO for free and I watched snippets of Star Wars and Empire Strikes Back whenever I could catch them -- I didn't see the movies all the way through until years later). renenet teases me about the gaps in my pop culture knowledge, but my parents just sort of... didn't do pop culture. And I didn't have friends to do sleepovers or go to the movies with (all my friends were long-distance), so it wasn't until high school that I did movies at all, and by then... I have no idea what my parents thought or expected or would have ruled out because I basically didn't tell them anything I was doing, ever.

As for books... we didn't really have books in the house (magazines, but very few books aside from some of my dad's college textbooks), and we didn't get to the public library very often, so basically I read what I could check out of the school library, which in small-town Texas was not a lot. So my parents really didn't monitor my book intake either; it was a de facto "read whatever your literacy level can handle" situation. What this meant was that when we visited my grandparents I read EVERYTHING I could get my hands on, which meant Tom Sawyer, Huckleberry Finn, and the Bible at one house and John Jakes and James Michener novels at the other house (plus my aunt's stash of romance novels after I found them hidden in her closet). And I also read Anne McCaffrey's Pern series at what was in retrospect probably an inappropriately young age, because my parents had never heard of them and had no idea that there was lots of sex involved, which I feel certain that they would have strenuously objected to. I was really only in it for the telepathic dragons; I mostly skipped the sex stuff, because who cared?
heresluck: (book)

From: [personal profile] heresluck


What on earth did they even do for entertainment?

My dad was (and is) a workaholic. My mom did the bored housewife routine: serial weird hobbies and, eventually, drinking. Upon reflection, it is not surprising that I struggle with work/life balance. Heh.

I am horrified for tiny me too! Years ago, [livejournal.com profile] truepenny and I identified the source of our tendency to spend money we didn't have on books we didn't need: we were terrified that we were going to RUN OUT OF BOOKS. More than twenty years after leaving my parents' house, and close to ten years after identifying the problem with my rational mind, I am only just starting to overcome this habit; I have literally hundreds of unread books in my house, more at my office, and a huge university library at my disposal, Gutenberg.org and the entire fucking internet at my fingertips, and I am only just now starting to feel secure in the notion that I AM NOT GOING TO RUN OUT OF THINGS TO READ.
Edited Date: 2013-02-06 08:48 pm (UTC)
heresluck: (book)

From: [personal profile] heresluck


Oh god, that ep would have given me nightmares. And made me grateful I don't need glasses. Hee.

But no, no TV reruns for me -- no Twilight Zone, Star Trek, etc. No new shows either, really -- I missed the Twin Peaks phenomenon, for example. I was a PBS baby, and in elementary school watched Saturday morning cartoons and the Muppet Show. My dad watched the news and Wall Street Week. My mom watched Cagney and Lacey, St. Elsewhere, Remington Steele, and eventually LA Law. In middle school I started taping MTV's 120 Minutes. After I left for college my brother started watching The History Channel a lot. But we weren't really a TV family. Basically I didn't watch TV until X-Files my last year of college. I kind of didn't GET television as a concept.

My life has changed a lot since then. Heh.
cathexys: dark sphinx (default icon) (Default)

From: [personal profile] cathexys


I'm pretty much doing what you're describing. I still have films I'm uncomfortable letting my older one watch when there's sexualized violence (it's still a no on clockwork Orange, for example at 14, though i'd say that will change, and he apparently watched Tarrantino on his own recently, which was another no for me), but other than that I'm fine letting him read what he wants and see things that aren't NC17.

My younger (11) is still a bit more limited, but I'm more concerned with moral complexities or certain types of ritualized violence than I am with sex or nudity.

One thing i've found is that I'm less worried about things on TV than I am in the movies...I think, because I\it's less immersive/overwhelming? When they were younger, i'd preview sometimes and they're still good about closing their eyes when i tell them (did that for a scene in The Following for younger one when we watched)

It's really hard and depends on kids and films...

In Germany, you can't enter a movie theatre younger than what's listed regardless of parent, so there wasn't much to decide for my parents. TV was less violent but had more sex. and I pretty much read what I wanted once I found my way to the library...
cathexys: dark sphinx (default icon) (Default)

From: [personal profile] cathexys


I was amazed the first time I saw kids in an R-rated movie. It's pretty much in small what constitutes one of the central differences between europe and the US. If a film is determined to be not appropriate for kids under 12, then no parent gets to decide that it is. Just like parents don't get to pull their kids out of school to do it themselves--for better or worse :)

the collective protects the child from its parents in the positive interpretation...the state has more influence than the parents in the negative one :)
cathexys: dark sphinx (default icon) (Default)

From: [personal profile] cathexys


Right. that's where the collective comes in. Like i'm fine having the German collective decide that noone gets to drag their 12 year old to The Last Passions of Christ. But I sure wouldn't my fellow Southerners tell me that you shouldn't take your 12 year old to see Milk....

But i'm not sure how I'd feel if I didn't agree with German norms :)
violace: (Default)

From: [personal profile] violace


My parents... kinda failed in that department? Well, they failed in a lot of ways, really, but that's another story. :D My father wasn't involved much in my upbringing, and my mother just didn't think it mattered much, or wasn't aware of the kind of violence presented in modern media, or simply thought I wouldn't actually watch adult stuff, or... I don't know? I'm really interested in asking her about that now, actually. Especially because I'm the youngest, only girl with two much older brothers, which caused my mom to be very overprotective more often than not.

I got my own TV pretty early - at 10 or 11 or even sooner, and one of my brothers had a huge collection of horror movies, video games and all kinds of stuff I shouldn't have had access to.

In my case, I'm thinking it's got something to do with the way my parents consume media. They never read books much and didn't grow up with television like that - for my mother, TV has always been something that runs in the background, something that doesn't affect her emotionally, nothing engaging.

And I don't think it had a negative impact on me, either. Nonetheless, I would definitely handle things differently with my own kids, should I ever have any. Probably like you do it, and then I think it's important to assess a kid's individual level of emotional stability.

I was born in '89, btw.

ETA: My parents or brothers wouldn't have taken me to a movie I wasn't legally allowed to see, though. Laws are a bit different here in Germany anyway, but I had no interest in seeing anything I wasn't allowed to at the movies either way. Thinking about it now, I wasn't *interested* in watching these things on TV either - they were simply available.
Edited Date: 2013-02-06 09:49 pm (UTC)
copracat: Tumnus and Lucy walking in the snow, arm in arm (lucy + tumnus = BFF)

From: [personal profile] copracat


I was born in Australia in the Sixties. My mum never seemed to forbid me any books, movies or tv by content. Only by time (go to bed!) or chores (put the book down and take the clothes off the line!)

But my age means that there was much less graphic violence on TV when I was 10/11. My mum and to some extent my dad were open to discussing anything I bought up with them about what I had seen or read. I appreciate that in hindsight.
montanaharper: close-up of helena montana on a map (Default)

From: [personal profile] montanaharper


My parents were pretty much like yours, in terms of there being no major restrictions (and I think you and I are about the same age, too). The only one I can remember specifically was my mother forbidding me to read Heinlein's Number of the Beast when I was eleven. So of course I snuck it off my dad's bookshelf and read it anyway. *koff*

With my kids, it depended on the kid. My daughter (now 24) was drastically restricted, to the point that she wasn't allowed to watch mainstream TV until she was nine or ten; she grew up on a diet of PBS, and limited PBS at that. Mainly, I put those restrictions in place because she didn't have a very strong sense of fantasy vs. reality when it came to visual stuff. Reading was never restricted, though I kept anything that was drastically adult (Anne Rice's porn, fanfic, etc.) put away. Of course, when she was about twelve, she started staying up late and watching Queer as Folk with me (with lots and lots of conversation about context), and then she discovered slash fanfic via Gundam Wing, so that was pretty much the end of any restrictions.

My son, on the other hand, never had any restrictions at all, because even from three or four he had this absolutely crystal clear concept of the divide between fantasy and reality. I still kept an eye on gore and violence, so as not to overwhelm him with it, but I'm not a big fan of, say, Tarantino, or blood-and-guts horror, so there wasn't a lot for him to be watching anyway. To this day (at age 17), the only two things that even begin to blur his line enough to actually be problematic for him are Arnold Vosloo mid-transformation in The Mummy (he does not like anthropomorphic skeletons at all) and the weeping angels in Doctor Who. I keep forgetting about that last one and sending him links to cool images from Tumblr (like the Xmas tree topper, which was awesome!), and he keeps IMing me back with "GEE THANKS, MOM." Oops? He doesn't read a lot (he needed vision therapy when he was younger, and didn't learn to read until he was seven; it's still physically harder for him than for the average person), but I never restricted the audio books he listened to, either. Mostly that was LotR, Terry Pratchett, and Douglas Adams.
thirdblindmouse: The captain, wearing an upturned pitcher on his head, gazes critically into the mirror. (Default)

From: [personal profile] thirdblindmouse


My parents put no restriction on books at all, and did not keep an eye on what movies I checked out from the library, but twice I asked for them to rent movies for me that they put restrictions on. My dad would not rent Shakespeare in Love for me to watch without adult supervision (I would have been about 12 years old), so we watched that together. My mother refused to let me watch Monty Python's Meaning of Life, and I still haven't gotten around to seeing it.

I'm sure they rented R rated movies or would-be-R-rated movies (my parents watch the most depressing foreign films) all the time and allowed us to watch with them, but when they remembered to think about ratings (because I asked for the film) they abode by them.
thirdblindmouse: The captain, wearing an upturned pitcher on his head, gazes critically into the mirror. (Default)

From: [personal profile] thirdblindmouse


There was simulated casual sex. *gasp* That's the only rateable thing I remember. I don't remember the naked breasts (unless they were part of the sex scene), but naked breasts don't strike me as particularly outre.

Huh, now that I check, Life of Brian was rated R too, and that I watched a dozen times. Again, though, I think that one was from the library, so my parents didn't have to think about it.
actiaslunaris: Galileo - Utsumi Kaoru resting her head on Yukawa Manabu's shoulder - text: a line-drawn heart (look to the distance)

From: [personal profile] actiaslunaris


Hmm. I was raised in a really restrictive environment when it came to visual media. I remember being taken to some kid-friendly films when I was younger than ten (Song of the South, Pinocchio, Short Circuit 1 & 2), but my parents decided that they would stop going to theaters, so I didn't see a lot of films in theaters until after I started going to college. I didn't see R-rated films until I was older than the recommended age, which is hilarious because my college had restrictions on going to see higher-rated films.

Oddly, my reading wasn't restricted at all, so I read everything I could get my hands on, including things that were probably far beyond what I should be reading in content and age level: loads and loads of romance novels, Pern, C.S. Lewis's That Hideous Strength (which is all kinds of disturbing with some of its imagery), The Scarlet Letter. Never a big deal made, never checked on. I knew I could talk to my mother if I wanted to have anything explained, but I never did.

Times are quite different now. My husband and I make a point about talking about media with our children, even though they are still young (one's eight and one's three). At those ages, most children only need to be guarded from anything that will cause nightmares. Youngest can't watch Doctor Who. Eldest can watch anything as long as it's under PG-13, and we've seen it before. (She knows her level of comfort with media and will tune out and stop watching if it's not her thing.)

One thing I've kept an eye on is feminist-friendly (or unfriendly) media. I have girls, so that's something that bothers me. Most children's programming is much friendlier in that respect, but there are a few that annoy me, like Higglytown Heroes, which got banned quickly when I discovered that one female character, who would dream up imaginative schemes, was constantly shot down by another female character and told that such schemes wouldn't work.

attackfish: Yshre girl wearing a kippah, text "Attackfish" (Default)

From: [personal profile] attackfish


My parents were kind of odd in what I was and was not allowed to watch. There was an absolute prohibition on TV shows where the adults were all idiots, because Mom thought I would feel insecure if I thought I had no one to go to for help, but a couple of weeks after I turned eleven, my mom and my brother sat me down and told me it was time for me to watch The Godfather Saga. Yes, it was mandatory. And after that great pinnacle of cinematic art traumatized the heck out of me, I got to watch Blazing Saddles, and thereafter, I could watch any rated R movie I wanted to. *shrugs*
attackfish: Yshre girl wearing a kippah, text "Attackfish" (Default)

From: [personal profile] attackfish


It is time for you to become a woman. It is time to watch The Godfather Saga!

Then, my mom was all "I have failed as a mother if you do not watch The Godfather Saga!" Now, she's like "In retrospect, you might have been a little young for that..."
frayadjacent: peach to blue gradient with the silouette of a conifer tree (Default)

From: [personal profile] frayadjacent


Interesting discussion! Born in '81 to political "moderates", I only have one memory of something being forbidden: at age 12 I wanted to read the Clan of the Cave Bear series, but my mother forbade it cause of the porny scenes. I pretended I didn't know why but of course I'd already read a lot of those scenes! My dad was pretty permissive, and actually I recall seeing a few things that he was watching that were pretty upsetting when I was younger, like maybe 8 or 10. (The one that stands out most is a courtroom scene in which a woman is recounting being raped; I suspect I'd never even heard of rape before then.)

If I ever have children, I suspect my approach will be similar to yours, Eunice. But I myself can only stand violence and gore up to network television levels, and my tolerqnce of sexual/sexualized violence is even lower, so if my 16 year old wanted to watch A Clockwork Orange I probably wouldn't try to stop them (though I would want to warn them), but they couldn't watch it with me around.
klia: (big baby)

From: [personal profile] klia


I think I was 10 or 11 when I saw my first R-rated movie -- Cabaret. I just rewatched it last night on TCM, and it brought back the memory. A friend invited me to go see it with her and her parents (our families knew each other), but my mom said no. So, I asked to spend the night at my friend's house, instead, and got the okay, then went to see it with them. To this day, I don't think I ever told my parents (I was a "good" kid, rarely got in trouble, and it was very OOC for me).

My mom's objection was definitely the violence and sexual situations, and she was probably right about it being a little too mature for me at that age, but I was way more freaked out by the way the Nazis crept into the story, kind of under the radar, and started beating and killing people (and Natalia's poor little dog!) than I was about the sex.

I'd seen some pretty disturbing movies on TV, like Night of the Living Dead (which I saw when I was about the same age) and The Birds (when I was 5 or 6), and The World at War, which I watched with my dad, was a very graphic documentary series about WWII, so I guess I didn't really get why my mom thought Cabaret was... worse?
amathela: (Default)

From: [personal profile] amathela


My experience was pretty much the same - though the first R-rated movie I remember seeing was Se7en, when I was eleven, so not so much with the lack of heavy violence/gore ;) It was pretty disturbing, but I was a really, really huge fan of Gwyneth Paltrow, so I would have withstood a lot for her.
grammarwoman: (Bookworm Emperor)

From: [personal profile] grammarwoman


To preface: you and I are the same age, but my kid (now 8) is younger than yours.

I was a voracious reader as a kid; I'm sure my parents were grateful when I could ride my bike the mile to the public library and they could stop driving me. I'd come home with a backpack full every time. In comparison, they themselves were casual readers, and they never understood my love for sci-fi and fantasy. My mom to this day hates sci-fi, blaming a movie she saw as a kid that scared the bejeesus out of her.

They never cared about what I was reading (maybe because what I was reading was so foreign to them); I don't ever remember restrictions on any of my books. When I was maybe 10 or so, I tried to check out Masquerade at the library, which for some reason was classified as an adult section book. My parents signed off on taking the children's section limitation off my library card, and my reading options exploded. The only time they ever interfered with my reading was when I was being punished; the most effective method they ever came up with was denying me TV and reading for fun. I got very good at sneaking books. :)

When I went home with one of my roommates in college, my mind was blown first by her family's enormous collection of sci-fi and fantasy books, and then by the revelation that her parents had greatly restricted what she could read. That would have been torture for me.

TV and movies were sort of the same, as I don't remember a lot of "You can't watch this!" but since my parents controlled my access to both, I guess there was vetting going on. I watched a lot of nighttime soaps with them (Dallas, Dynasty, Falcon Crest), police procedurals (Cagney & Lacey, Hill Street Blues), and sitcoms (Cosby Show, Family Ties). I knew I was getting to be a big kid the farther I could stay up into the annual showings of "Sound of Music" and "Wizard of Oz". ;)

We didn't go to see a lot of movies when I was a kid, but we took advantage of rentals once we got a VCR. During the summer, I watched a ton of movies on cable, too, as well as soap operas. I hated horror (and still do), and the cable channels didn't show much that was really adult during the day, so I never really watched too much above my age. When I got old enough and had an allowance, I would bike to the cheap movie theater to watch PG movies on my own.

My experience with my son has been almost completely different; I let him control what's on TV most of the time (which means on-demand or DVRed Disney and Cartoon Network, or videogames), saving my stuff to watch until after his bedtime. We've shown him Star Wars IV-VI, a little bit of Star Trek, the first few Harry Potters, the Indiana Jones trilogy, and Futurama, among other things. (The last one got us into trouble a few years ago at daycare, when he watched "Jurassic Bark" during breakfast and was upset most of the day.)

I've only restricted his access to a few shows (because OMG Disney Channel, are you TRYING to kill all our brain cells with your inane tween series?), but I explain to him why (with the latest one, I told him flat-out that it's beyond stupid, none of the characters are likable, and I don't want him to think that any of their behavior is acceptable). I also wouldn't let him play the Harry Potter 5-7 Lego so he won't be spoiled for the series before he watches/reads it, but I may let that one go. I really want to show him the LOTR series, but I'm afraid he'll get restless in the slower spots and creeped out by the Nazgul. I'm sure we'll clash more as he gets older.

He loves graphic novels, but so far hasn't tried to bring home anything much about his grade level.

So, um, sorry for expounding at length?
.

Profile

fan_eunice: (Default)
fan_eunice

Most Popular Tags

Powered by Dreamwidth Studios

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags